아우디 A6 연비 과장 논란...소비자 보상 따를 듯국토부의 검

아우디 A6 연비 과장 논란...소비자 보상 따를 듯
국토부의 검증 결과 아우디 A6의 연비가 제작사인 아우디 측의 신고 기준 대비 10% 이상 낮게 나온 것으로 전해졌다. 문제는 연비 측정에 영향을 주는 주행저항값의 오차 때문으로 밝혀졌다.

국토부는 지난해 자기인증 적합 조사에서 아우디 A6 3.0 TDI의 연비 검증 결과 아우디 측이 제시한 표시 연비 대비 5% 가량 높은 허용 오차 범위를 보였다고 밝혔다. 구체적인 내용이 공개되지 않았지만 10% 이상 과장된 것으로 알려지고 있다.

A6 3.0 TDI는 지난 2013년 1월부터 2015년 4월까지 10,200대 가량 팔린 아우디의 중심 모델 중 하나다. 특히 15%를 넘어서는 대대적인 할인 공세를 이유로 해당 모델을 구입한 소비자들도 상당수다.

기준 허용 오차를 넘어선 연비에 대해 아우디는 이의를 제기했고 이에 따른 재검증을 마쳤지만 역시나 허용 범위를 벗어났다.

문제는 주행 저항값에서 시작됐다. 아우디 측에 제시한 주행저항값을 기준으로 하면 오차 범위가 대폭 줄어들었다.

아우디는 독일 정부에 제출한 주행 저항값을 바탕으로 산업 통상 자원부에서 연비를 공인을 받았다. 하지만 국토부 결과는 달랐다.

주행저항값은 자동차가 주행할 때 받는 공기 저항과 도로 마찰을 수치화한 것으로 이 기준값을 계측장비에 입력한 뒤 연비를 측정하는 것이 보통이다. 저항값이 커지면 연비가 떨어질 수 있으며 저항값이 낮아지면 연비가 오를 수 있게 된다. 현대차 역시 싼타페 연비 관련 법정 다툼에서 이 주행저항값을 주요 이슈로 내세우고 있다.

아우디가 제시한 주행저항값을 반영하면 A6 3.0 TDI의 연비는 오차 범위내로 들어온다.

아우디 측은 억울하다는 입장이지만 이는 수입사의 입장일 뿐 실질적인 피해자는 해당 모델을 구입한 소비자들이다.

업계서도 기업의 윤리와 관계된 문제로 보며 한국GM처럼 수입사가 자발적인 수정 및 연비 보상을 하는 것이 좋을 것이라는 의견을 내비추고 있다. 한국GM은 쉐보레 크루즈 1.8의 연비가 9% 가량 부풀려졌다는 문제로 자발적으로 연비를 정정한 뒤 소비자 보상을 진행한 바 있다. 현대차도 싼타페에 대한 연비 보상을 진행했다.

아우디는 내달 중으로 국토부에 연비 관련 해명 자료를 제출할 예정이며 국토부 역시 6월 중으로 아우디 연비 문제를 종결할 예정이다.

국토부에서 벌금 등을 부과할 확률은 낮지만 소비자들에 대한 보상은 불가피할 예정이다.

한편 도요타 프리우스도 연비 과장 논란에 휩싸인 바 있지만 재검증 결과 오차 범위를 넘지 않은 수준의 연비를 보였다.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

Audi A6 fuel controversy over exaggerated ... Consumer compensation seemed to followMinistry of land, infrastructure and transport A fuel-efficient production of 6 sign verified results Audi Audi side's report more than 10% of the base has been shown to lower the contrast. The problem is that the fuel economy measure, which affects the driving resistance turned out to be due to errors. The Department of land suitable for self certification survey last year, Audi A6 3.0 TDI fuel economy verification results show presented by Audi side fuel economy by as much as 5 percent in preparation for high tolerance looked said. Details have not been disclosed by 10% or more exaggerated. A6 3.0 TDI in the past – since January, April 10 until 2015, roughly 200 is one of Audi's sold-centric model. In particular, big discount 15% beyond the offensive reasons many consumers also purchased the model. Standard tolerances beyond fuel economy about the Audi was raised to this has to have figured out an acceptable range. The problem began in the driving resistance. Audi side when on the basis of the proposed driving resistance dramatically reduced margin of error. Audi Germany filed based on the driving resistance government industry and Commerce Ministry authorized fuel economy. But the Department of homeland and the results are different. When you receive the car driving driving resistance air resistance and friction with the road on this basis to quantify the value of measuring equipment and measuring the back entered in fuel economy. Resistance increases fuel consumption can drop resistance decreases, it will be able to rise to the fuel. Hyundai Santa Fe fuel economy-related court too in this contention is the main issue driving resistance. Audi A6 3.0 TDI proposed reflect the driving resistance of fuel economy comes in the fudge factor. Audi side is wrongfully entered this number of days as well but the real victims are the consumers who bought that model. The industry is also watching the corporate ethics and related issues like GM have joined voluntary modifications and Korea fuel economy will be rewarded in my opinion illuminates. South Korea GM is Chevrolet cruise 1.1 9 percent were inflating of the fuel issues corrected after the consumer compensation voluntarily fuel economy progress. Hyundai Santa Fe fuel efficiency also compensates for. Audi is part of land into the '' fuel economy is expected to submit the relevant clarifications data part as of June, the Ministry also Audi mileage will terminate the problem. The probability of low charge, such as the Ministry of Department fines consumers for compensation will be inevitable. Even the Toyota Prius gas mileage while exaggerating the controversy in bars but not to exceed the range of error level fuel economy results of re-verification.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

... Audi A6 fuel exaggerated controversy seemed to follow the consumer compensation
reportedly has fuel consumption of the Audi A6 Homeland negative test results came out lower than 10% of manufacturers reported basis compared to the Audi side. The problem turned out to be due to errors in driving resistance that affect fuel consumption measurement. Homeland blow last year of Conformity is suitable investigation Audi A6 3.0 fuel consumption test results Audi side is presented by displaying fuel consumption by 5% around a high tolerance TDI boyeotdago said. DETAILED has been more than 10% did not disclose exaggerated. A6 3.0 TDI is one of the central models of the Audi sold for about the past from January 2013 to April 2015, 10,200. In particular, consumers who bought the model for massive discounts offensive exceed 15% two euros also many C. had raised the Audi claim for mileage beyond the standard tolerances finished the re-verification accordingly, but escaped figured acceptable range. the problem started in running resistance value. If, based on the running resistance values ​​presented in the Audi side margin of error is greatly reduced. Audi has received the certified fuel consumption in the Energy industry typically based on the running resistance value submitted to the German government. But the result was different land portion. The running resistance value, it is usual to measure the fuel behind the car enters the reference value that incoming digitized airflow resistance and road friction when driving in instrumentation. Larger resistance values ​​may decrease fuel consumption and thereby fuel consumption can rise when low resistance value. Hyundai also put forward the running resistance value in Santa Fe fuel-related legal disputes with major issues. If you reflect driving resistance Audi presented A6 3.0 TDI's fuel economy comes into the tolerance range. Position that Audi side seems unfair, but that the position of importers only one real victims are the consumers who purchased the models. industry has even looked into issues related to business ethics and shining my opinion importers would be preferable to voluntary modifications, and fuel economy like Korea reward GM. GM Korea is a progress bar behind the consumer compensation voluntarily correct a problem with a fuel jyeotdaneun inflated about 9 percent of the fuel Chevrolet Cruze 1.8. Hyundai was also proceed with mileage compensation for Santa Fe. Audi is planning to submit a mileage-related clarification materials to the Department of Homeland parts into next month plans to terminate the Audi fuel economy issues into the land section is also June chance to impose such fines in the land section compensation for consumers is low, but is expected to be inevitable. the Toyota Prius was also a bar, but the level of fuel consumption does not exceed the margin of error resulting revalidation engulfed in controversy exaggerated fuel consumption.