Công ty tôi có ký hợp đồng bán hàng

Công ty tôi có ký hợp đồng bán hàng hóa cho một công ty khác (hàng này được công ty này đăt làm riêng), trong hợp đồng thỏa thuận rất rõ ràng về quyền và nghĩa vụ của hai bên. Phía công ty tôi cử người đại diện theo pháp luật đứng ra ký, phía công ty đối tác cử phó giám đốc đứng ra đại diện (theo giới thiệu của họ, người phó giám đốc này đủ thẩm quyền ký), vì tin tưởng nên chúng tôi không kiểm tra giấy ủy quyền mà tiến hành ký kết trực tiếp.Trên hợp đồng có con dấu của hai công ty, tuy nhiên, sau khi chúng tôi hoàn thành nghĩa vụ giao hàng thì bên đối tác không thanh toán. Tính đến thời điểm này đã một năm kể từ ngày tới hạn thanh toán, trong 1 năm qua tôi có gửi yêu cầu đời nợ nhiều lần nhưng bên mua luôn xin gia hạn nợ, gần đây chúng tôi có gửi yêu cầu xác nhận công nợ là 300 triệu đồng tiền hàng và 70 triệu đồng tiền phạt chậm trả theo sự thỏa thuận của hai bên nhưng bên đối tác từ chối chi trả với lý do hợp đồng giữa 2 bên vô hiệu do người phó giám đốc ký không đúng thẩm quyền.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

My company has signed a contract to sell the goods to another company (this row is the bespoke company), contractual agreements are clear about the rights and obligations of both parties. Behind my company to appoint representatives at law stand up, the partner company appointed vice president stands out representatives (according to their introduction, the deputy director of the full authority to sign), because trust should we do not check the authorization letter which directly proceed to conclude.
Contract seal on the two companies, however, after we complete the delivery obligations, the non-payment partners. Up to this point has one year from the due date of payment, in the first years I have sent requests lifetime of debt many times but buyers are debt extension, recently we have sent confirmation request liabilities 300 million for goods and 70 million fine for late paid according to the agreement of both parties, but the partners refuse to pay on the grounds that the contract between the two parties disabled due to a deputy director signed ultra vires.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

My company has signed a sales contract for another company (which is made by this company separately), in a contract agreement very clearly on the rights and obligations of the two parties. On the part of the company I sent the law representative to stand out, the party of the partnership Deputy director stood out to represent (according to their introduction, the Deputy Director has sufficient authority to sign), believing that we do not check the power of attorney that Direct signing operation.
On the contract has the seal of the two companies, however, after we fulfill the obligation of delivery, the partner does not pay. As of this time has been a year since the due date of payment, for 1 year I have submitted a request for debt many times but the buyer always please renew the debt, recently we have submitted a request for confirmation of the debt is 300 million in the currency and 70 million fines are delayed under the agreement of either party but the partner refuses to pay for the reason the contract between the two parties is invalid by the Deputy Director to sign improper jurisdiction.

Kết quả (Anh) 3:

My company has signed a sale contract to another company that has been assigned to this company personally, in a very clear deal of rights and obligation to one of the other firmly signed by the law, In the company of the partners who nominated the deputy director to stand up to their recommendation, the deputy director has the authority to sign, so we don't check the authorization to proceed directly.
On the contract of two companies, however, after we've finished our delivery duty, our partners have no payment, until this time has been a year from day to day to day to payment, I've sent a debt requirement for many times. Recently, our debt has been submitted to confirm that the debt is 300-million dollars and 70-million dollars dollars of fine payment at the end of the deal, but the partners have refused to pay for the reason why the two-based ratings are not signed by the vice president. Right on authority.